More on Cabrera
The Marlins putting Cabrera on the block seems to be the most enticing possibility for other teams this offseason, and for good reason.
The known ones are the Yankees, Dodgers, Angels and White Sox. The Red Sox could also be a potential suitor if Lowell doesn't re-sign.
First the Yankees.
Brian Cashman has expressed his preference not to deal any of the three young pitchers, making it unlikely that the Yankees will land Cabrera this winter.
"I've been tested on those guys this week, during the summer at the deadline, and I'll continue to be tested on it," Cashman said. "Obviously the preference is not to make moves with our young pitching; it's as simple as that. But you can never say never. It's going to take a lot, I know that."
"It's pretty obvious which players we're not going to trade," Hank Steinbrenner told the Associated Press yesterday. "Chamberlain, Hughes and even Kennedy. Not for a position player.
"It's like Cashman said: You never say untouchable, but at least least-touchable."
If the three pitchers are truly off the table, I doubt Cabrera will find himself in pinstripes.
Next up the Dodgers.
The Dodgers probably have the most to offer.
Then there is the Angels.
The Angels would probably have to throw-in one of their pitching prospects, also.
And the team that least fits the areas the Marlins are looking for, among the ones mentioned, is the White Sox.
Obviously that still leaves other teams, which aren't being speculated about at the moment.
Should the Marlins trade Cabrera I can almost guarantee, it won't come cheap. And nor should it.
0 recs |
2 comments
|
Comments
Dodgers or bust.
Getting all four would be unreal, made possible to think about only because of Coletti's previous blunders and apparent distaste for all things young and good. Since it's the Marlins, it's hard to imagine them not demanding both pitchers (or perhaps Elbert instead of Kershaw, if the Dodgers put their collective feet down; not a huge dropoff, and they're young enough that TINSTAAPP is still worth noting, but you'd stil rather have Kershaw). And that's good, since the pitchers have higher ceilings. So the question may come down to whether you take Kemp or LaRoche. They're both Opening Day starters, both conceivably at positions of need. And since everything we've seen and heard indicates the FO thinks upgrading infield defense is more important than centerfield offense, even though Kemp would do for the latter more than LaRoche for the former, I think that will be their target.
And honestly, if Kershaw was a little closer to the majors, I don't think you could draw up a better package. It's like Arizona and Dontrelle last year, except this time, it might actually happen.
you had me at
Go Blueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee plz
by Maverick on Nov 8, 2007 11:54 AM EST up reply actions

by 














