Rollins overtakes Hanley in All-Star Votes
Jimmy Rollins, who is currently sporting a much lower batting average and on-base percentage than our own beloved Emilio Bonifacio, has just taken over the SS lead for the All-Star game. Rollins, despite trailing Hanley is just about every singe statistical category, leads him by over 50,000 votes.
This is just another example of why the fans should not vote in the All-Star starters if the game is going to impact the World Series. If the All-Star game reverted back to being just a mid-season exhibition, then by all means whoever the fans vote for, they should get. But the game does determine who gets home field advantage in October, and you mean to tell me that it's truly in the best interest of baseball to have a man with a .221 average starting over Hanley who has an OBP over .400!?
I respect Rollins for what he has accomplished over his career, but Ramirez deserves the starting nod this year, without question.
It irked me when Cabrera was denied his starting bid at third base by David Wright, and I will be equally miffed if Hanley has to take a back seat to an inferior Rollins this year (it might have something to do with J-Roll being a Phillie and all).
Is anyone else upest by this? Or am I just over-reacting?
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's a sad state of affairs
But public voting is tradition and probably won’t change. It makes fans feel more in tune with the game and adds value to tickets and sponsorships. It’s all about dollars and cents and as far as MLB is concerned having a fair game doesn’t matter to that. If it did, bullpens would be a lot more full, players would get compensated (though they do get $$$$$$ of free gifts), and it would be played in stadiums that allow the greatest ## of fans to attend.
That being said, I think if players like Manny and that guy from Nat’s Town make it on a roster, or even close to a roster, MLB will consider how voting is done this off season. Or at least I hope…
Overreaction.
For one, we’re talking about guys with minimal talent difference who are playing, what, three innings? The performance difference between Hanley and Rollins over that short amount of time is negligible. Hell, the difference between Hanley and Bonerface over that short amount of time is practically negligible. Not to mention the fact that there is no way Hanley won’t make the team or won’t play; in fact, it’s highly possible Hanley will play as much or more as a bench player than as a starter.
Moreover, the idea of World Series home field is pretty negligible as well. Depending on which historical records you want to use (all MLB games vs. playoff games vs. World Series games), a match-up of two equal teams will see the team with home field advantage win the series 51-52% of the time. MLB HFA isn’t huge to begin with (54-57%, again depending on which games you want to look at), and the nature of a playoff series is that the biggest advantage you can get is one extra game. If we were talking about getting home field for the entire series, it’d be worth worrying about; otherwise, not so much.
That being said, there are a ton of things “less important” than the World Series that are affected quite greatly by the All-Star Game. Things like bonuses, arbitration rulings, awards voting, HOF voting… the fact that things like this can be affected by fan voting is less than fantastic. Then again, I’d honestly rather have the millions of MLB fans doing the voting than the hundred or so members of the BBWAA or even the players themselves (who, much like coaches in college football, often don’t actually vote but rather hand it off to some clubhouse assistant).
All in all, until they let me, and me alone, set the teams, we’re going to have less than perfect results. I just embrace the failings, because in the end, it’s much more fun to try to work up some outrage than it would be to look at the results and just go “hmm, not bad actually.”
Marlins Stadium: When It's Raining, The Roof Will Happen!
And that all is without even getting into the real issue
of what defines an all-star, and specifically whether the question is who has had the best half-year, best year-since-last-ASG, best career or is the best player right now. Or in a very simple question: if Albert Pujols is healthy, is he ever not an ASG starter, regardless of his stats?
Marlins Stadium: When It's Raining, The Roof Will Happen!
I feel like Pujols has earned some leeway.
But I also feel like Rollins isn’t Pujols. Pujols is the consensus best hitter in baseball; even going into the season, you could make a strong case for Rollins not even being one of the top 2 shortstops in his division.
Granted, you could also make a case for the NL East having the league’s three best shortstops. But still — at this point, I’d say Hanley is closer to Pujols (i.e. obviously the best current player at his position) than to Rollins (a strong player who has been an All-Star before). And by voting in Rollins, they’re voting out a guy who is not only better so far this season, but has a stronger track record in previous years.
Yeah, and we broke your damn shot clock too.
Haha
I appreciate the honesty. I guess whoever wins the starting nod really isn’t that big of a deal, but….I just wish that it won’t be a Phillie.

by 
















