Marlins Reality Check: 1983 Orioles
How do the 2009 Florida Marlins stack up to other teams that had magical seasons? Are the Comeback Kids for real? Here's my take, feel free to pick a team whose memory is rekindled by watching the contemporary Marlins and post your own analysis.
I personally followed Orioles "magic" through the 1983 season. It was my baptism by fire into baseball as I worked during my college years at Alaska Stands in Ocean City, Maryland. The guys who worked there did two things: surf and baseball. It was a tough life, but somebody had to do it.
I did not pay much attention to statistics back then (and still don't pay as much attention as I should), but I do recall that the Os led the league in home runs in 1983. For a time, it seemed that not even that grand accomplishment would carry them into the post-season.
But, the Orioles simply would not go quietly into that good night. They would come back even when their starting pitching wasn't on point. They would come back from impossible deficits. They would come back even when the bats had fallen silent earlier in the game. The public relations people called it "Oriole magic" and even commissioned a song to go along with it.
Even though we are only 12 games into this young 2009 season, the Marlins remind me of the 1983 Orioles because they never say die. Both teams came back from deficits by finding a way to win, typically through the long ball, but also with smart base stealing and timely hitting with runners in scoring position. And, gosh darn it, these Marlins are at least as fun to watch as were the Os.
So I spent some time comparing and contrasting numbers from Baseball Reference, the indispensible source of data about everything baseball. I present numbers for the offense in this installment. Assuming there is interest I will examine the pitching numbers in part 2.
(I spent some time making the following table look pretty, but sbnation stripped out all my work. Well, here it is anyway.)
| Orioles | Marlins | ||
| 1983 | 2009 | ||
| as of | 2009.04.19 | ||
| Counting Stats | |||
| through | annualized | ||
| game | season | ||
| 12 | totals | ||
| Runs scored | 799 | 77 | 1040 |
| Runs allowed | 652 | 45 | 608 |
| Plate app. | 6272 | 455 | 6143 |
| At bats | 5546 | 428 | 5778 |
| Hits | 1492 | 117 | 1580 |
| Doubles | 283 | 21 | 284 |
| Triples | 27 | 4 | 54 |
| HR | 168 | 15 | 203 |
| RBI | 761 | 74 | 999 |
| SB | 61 | 9 | 122 |
| CS | 33 | 2 | 27 |
| BB | 601 | 48 | 648 |
| IBB | 48 | 3 | 41 |
| SO | 800 | 107 | 1445 |
| TB | 2333 | 191 | 2579 |
| Percentage Stats | |||
| BA | 0.269 | 0.273 | |
| OBP | 0.340 | 0.352 | |
| SLG | 0.421 | 0.446 | |
| OPS | 0.761 | 0.798 | |
Analysis
First of all, look down there at the strikeout total. HOLY CRAP! In fewer relative plate appearances the Marlins are looking mighty impatient at the plate, to say the least.
More walks are nice, twice the number of triples is a treat, and a lot more home runs help win ballagames. I'm putting a mental asterisk next to that modern HR total as today's boys of Summer might still enjoy a little help from their friends. Also, let's not forget that they faced the hapless Washington Nationals in half of these first 12 games.
I like the improved ratio of runs scored to runs allowed over the Orioles, that is exactly how ballgames are won.
The stolen base/caught stealing ratio works out to a healthy %82 and with guys like Hanley and Bonifacio making smart choices about when to steal, their speed makes it no contest.
I don't expect Boney to stick around all season as he has already reverted to his personal mean, and it's pretty mean, folks. The knock on him by the Nationals was that he can't hit and can't field; if he can't get on base, his speed is worthless. Let's hope they can at least teach him selectivity and patience at the plate so that he can continue to disturb opposing pitchers. I'm not sure how many runs they will watch him allow at the hot corner before they sit him for a more competent third bagger, though.
Conclusion
The rest of the stats don't jump out at me with any force, especially since the Marlins' projected counting totals are based on an unsustainable run. Still, it is the manner in which the Marlins win games that is infectious and has grabbed the attention of national sports commentators. This, after many had written off the team during Spring Training.
Even when the inevitable losing streak sets in, I think these 2009 Marlins are going to be a fun team to watch. When that happens, take heart Marlins fans, they will find a way to come back. I have seen it before, and I'm confident that we will see it again.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting stuff.
Would you look at that: their third-baseman hit .208/.259/.299 too! (it’s a preemptive ‘too’ obviously, but, come on, you know you wouldn’t be shocked).
And that prorated K total would indeed be the most ever, as far as I know. Where you at now, 2001 Brewers?
Marlins Stadium: When It's Raining, The Roof Will Happen!
Good post.
I really want to believe this “team of destiny” thing, but I’m concerned with how the team got itself in a position to need three 9th-inning comebacks in the first place.
At least in this series, the Marlins looked like the ’08 version in innings 1-8. They struck out a ton (against not-so-great starters) and were terrible with RISP. All we needed was a classic “Mike Jacobs angrily slamming his bat down after stranding men on second and third” moment.
There really wasn’t even that much smart baseball. The comebacks happened because of clutch homers and doubles lashed into the gaps, all on pitches over the plate. There was also a timely walk or two, but the lack of overall walks drawn in the series was alarming.
For any team that “never says die,” there’s an opponent that refuses to kill ‘em. The Nationals are bad—really bad. We might as well have been playing the Durham Bulls, which is where half of Sunday’s bullpen now pitches.
Against a team with a real bullpen (think: Putz and K-Rod in NY, Lidge in Philly, etc.), possibly all three of those games would’ve been losses. Sorry to sound like a killjoy, but I’m just worried that a lot of weaknesses were masked by a horrible opponent.
No, no. Bring it on. I am—how do they put it—cautiously optimistic knowing that this simply can not last. So I’m soaking it up while it lasts.
I did this as much for the exercise to my own noggin, since I learn something every time I dig into the stats. The first thing that caught my eye was that ridiculous projected strikeout total. That has to be an anomaly created by such a small initial sample size. At this point in the season percentages have more meaning to them, ratios rather than counting totals.
Still, while it’s fun for me to laugh from afar at the next low that my hometown Nats find a way to reach, it’s even more fun to watch my adopted Marlins do what they’ve been doing and I wanted to see if there is anything to it.
I definitely am glad to see that there are savvy analytical Marlins fans here, because I hung with a contingent who follow the Nats that don’t take prisoners. This is a Good Thing. I learn more and appreciate the games more.
Thanks.
Yes, and if the Marlins had made none of those ninth-inning comebacks, they’d still be 8-4. If that’s the worst-case scenario, I can live with it….
well, it's not so much the start that I'm talking about,
but rather what it means for the rest of our season. The wins are terrific, but some of the problems in the Nats series worried me going forward. But then, I’m an eternal worrywart so who knows.

by 


















