FishStripes: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Via MLBTradeRumors.com; JJ will NOT sign an extentsion!

ESPN's Jerry Crasnick is reporting that contract extension talks between Josh Johnson and the Marlins have reached an impasse, and that the righthander will not agree to a new deal with the team at all. "Based on our conversations, there's no chance of doing a long-term deal with the Marlins," [Johnson's agent Matt] Sosnick said. "We made it clear that it was going to be this year or it wasn't going to happen. It was now or never. And the Marlins agreed." Sosnick says that Johnson made it clear he wanted to remain with the team, "but they just weren't comfortable going to the fourth year." Marlins' GM Michael Hill wouldn't comment on the negotiations as per team policy. The 25-year-old Johnson had a 3.23 ERA in 33 starts for the Marlins this year, making his first All Star Team. The righty earned $1.45MM in 2009, and has two more years of arbitration eligibility remaining before he hits the free agent market. Sosnick added that given his age and performance, Johnson's next contract could be worth nine figures

0 recs  |  Comment 67 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

This blows!

Trade him now tho! His value at the moment is off the charts! We can get a HUGE haul for him. We’re working towards 2012 and we need the prospects we get for him to be ready by then. Don’t take a risk. One injury or underachieving season can change everything.

by JP 23 on Nov 20, 2009 11:15 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

goddamn

we need JJ, he was our only solid starter…this MUST get done

-"No excuses, No explanations"
-Matty's assistant
- LN21 and MHTD - Going Commando

by MiamihastheDolphins.... on Nov 21, 2009 12:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Twins fan here

The Twins blogs are all putting Josh Johnson as offseason priority #2, right behind a Mauer extension. But we have had a huge range ideas of what a trade would require.

I know I saw some reports that it would Aaron Hicks and then a ton more, others have been Revere and Perkins. Just want to take the temperature of a Marlins blog. What do you think?

Thanks

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 2:41 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

For the Twins, Any deal for JJ would have to start Aaron Hicks.

I can see a deal for both JJ and Dan Uggla similar to the Miguel Cabrera and Dontrelle Willis trade to Detroit back in ‘07. If you recall, the Marlins recieved the Tigers #1 (Cameron Maybin), #3 (Andrew Miller), #7 (Eulogio De La Cruz, and 3 mid-level prospects (Mike Rabelo, Burke Badenhop, and Dallas Trahern). Unfortunately for us, we got the short end of the stick on that deal, but that’s the risk you take when you trade your two best players (at the time) for a bunch of unknown, unproven, but talented minor leaguers. Hopefully this time we’ll scout better. We could have had Jair Jurrgens instead of Miller. Bummer.

But anyways back to your question, if we included Uggla (which I think is a teal possibility) It would take something like Hicks, Wilson Ramos, Kyle Gibson, and 2 mid-level prospects. That’s a lot to give up. Personally, if I were the Twins, I would take a long hard look at Hicks and Ramos and ask myself “are they really going to be better pro players than an elite ace starter such as Johnson or a 2 time all star with middle of the line-up type power?” If the answer is no, than just hang up the phone (And call the Blue Jays and ask for Roy Halladay). IMO, speaking as a baseball fan and not a homer, I would think twice. JJ’s great and all, but he’s no Miguel Cabrera. However, a deal won’t get done unless the Marlins are overwhelmed. Marlins front office is always trying to win every deal. Fortunately for the Marlins, they’re smart. They know that It only takes one team to bite and give them the prospects they’re seeking. It’s gonna happen, It always does. Doesn’t mean it’s going to be the Twins, but if they are really that interested in JJ, all they need to do is look back at the ’07 Miguel Cabrera deal to have an idea of what it would cost.

And for Josh Johnson alone you ask? It would still take Hicks and Ramos and likely two mid-level pitching prospects. OR! It could cost you Ben Revere, Wilson Ramos, AND Kyle Gibson, and mid-level pitching prospect. Which deal would you prefer?

by JP 23 on Nov 21, 2009 9:14 AM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

As a Twins fan

One problem, Kyle Gibson, like all draftees, can not be traded until one year after he was drafted. So take him out of the equation all together.

As for Hicks, he is pretty clearly our best prospect. I think the Twins should try as hard as they can to keep him. Basically any trade for Johnson OR Uggla without Hicks I am would love. That said, I realize if we want Johnson in a deal, he would probably have to be traded (No way we trade him for just Uggla) but I don’t see the Twins front office trading him at all.

Ben Revere, IMO, is expendable. He has a lot of potential, being a better version of Juan Pierre (like when he was good). But, we have a bit of a logjam in the outfield all of a sudden, with Cuddyer, Span, Delmon, Rene Tosoni, Hicks, etc. so we don’t need him to fill a hole right now.

Ramos is in a similar position. Really good catcher offensively and defensively. He should be thought of along with Carlos Santana, Derek Norris and Jason Castro. He is the real deal. Not only can mash, but he will stay behind the plate, unlike Jesus Montero. I don’t completely know the Marlins catcher situation, but Ramos could be the answer by the end of 2010. That said, he is expendable because the Twins have Mauer, and behind him Jose Morales (good hitter, not a great fielder)

Other players the Marlins could be interested in:

David Bromberg, bull-dog pitcher, probably the #1 pitching prospect in the Twins system besides Gibson. Look for him to be close to the BA Top 100, he has had really great numbers in the minors, and they are backed up by great scouting reports as well. He is legit.

Rob Delaney or Anthony Slama, Both of these guys are relievers who have recently shot up through the Twins system. Both should be on our opening day roster, or at least up by the all-star break. Both could be 7th or 8th inning guys by 2011. Their value is huge, MLB ready relievers under team control is a big asset, just look at the huge salaries relievers are getting (ex. Juan Cruz!) and the prospects they can get in the market (Sherrill for Josh Bell).

Rene Tosoni is a solid all-around outfield prospect in the mold of Cuddyer. The kind of guy who could hit .285 with 15 homers and good LF or RF defese.

Jeff Manship and Glen Perkins are also expendable, but both are good #4-#5 starters. Perkins has proven what he can do in the majors, but pissed off the Twins front office, so he is gone.

If I were the GM, and I were offered:

Uggla and Josh Johnson
for
Hicks, Ramos, Bromberg (I am substituting him for Gibson from your proposal), Mike McCardell and Glen Perkins

I would say no.

Packages I might offer:
Hicks, Bromberg, Delaney and Perkins
Revere, Ramos, Perkins

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 11:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting Trade possibly in the works

I just heard about this, and thought it I should pass it on to my new buddies of Marlins world.

A reputable Twins blogger, Thrylos of tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com says he has some info on a “blockbuster” trade in the works between the Twins and Marlins, via Twitter (Thrylos98)

The trade would be
Nolasco and Uggla (possibly something else)
for
Glen Perkins, Alexi Casilla, “highly rated prospects and other 25 man roster players”

He says that it would go down soon after Thanksgiving

Take this at face value, its a blogger.
But in my experiences, Thrylos is a long-time and reputable blogger though.

But regardless of how truthful this is, it’s interesting material

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 12:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Nolasco...

I really don’t know the quality of the prospects you just listed but I really hope Florida’s FO doesn’t trade Ricky coming off a bad year ERA wise. Unless both the Marlins and Twins understand FIP and that Ricky is probably a top ten starter in the NL, I doubt Florida’s really getting back what Nolasco’s actually worth. And Alexi Casilla did show flashes in 2008 but he’s been skyrocketing downward in the past year. I don’t think I like this trade at all.

I’d rather sell high on JJ than let another team buy low on Nolasco.

by tdp992 on Nov 21, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

let me some up the twins side for you

Perkins is a solid starter, good #4/5, possibly even a #3 starter in the NL. Lefty who can rack up innings with about a 4.20 ERA or so. He has had some really good games, but also some bad stretches. But he has proven himself somewhat.

Alexi Casilla has tools. But his defense is erratic, and his hitting is an anomaly. There have been a few times, where all of us Twins fans have thought he was a sure thing, the next Luis Castillo. But then there is this year, where he was downright awful. All that said, this would be trading him when his value is low.

In this scale of a trade, Casilla and Perkins would not be the centerpieces, but they are solid players to round out the deal. I would guess something like Ben Revere would be involved as well.

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure that Kyle Gibson has played at least one season now. Ya, he's eligible. Look at it again.

As for Nolasco and Uggla to the Twins, I find it hard to believe that the Twins would rather have Nolasco than JJ if the could get him (which they can now). But if this is true, I’d rather see a Ben Revere, Wilson Ramos, and two mid-level pitching prospects. Gives us Kenny Lofton Jr and a stud young catcher. Gives the Twins a solid #3 starter in the AL (who could potentially be a #2) and a middle of the line-up bat.

by JP 23 on Nov 21, 2009 4:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Twins Perspective

Kyle Gibson is not eligible to be traded. You have to wait a whole year after the draft. So he is eligible in June of 2010.

My guess for why the Twins want Nolasco more than Johnson
-They are fairly similar skill wise, but Nolasco was incredibly unlucky. Nolasco had a 3.35 FIP and Johnson had 3.06. Closer than they might seem at least.
-Nolasco will be cheaper to hold onto. Johnson is asking for nearly $10 million a year according to recent reports, which the Twins just don’t have as a mid-market team trying to keep Morneau and Mauer together. Nolasco is under team control through 2012.
-Nolasco will cost less in prospects. I have to assume that Nolasco would require less in a trade. This is especially important if the Twins want Uggla too, they just don’t have unlimited prospects.

The Hochevar Principle: The future comes to all teams. Some teams wait for it. Those teams finish in last place a lot.

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like what the rangers have to offer

build a package around feliez/holland and smoak for Uggla and JJ.
I’m not sold on what the Twins have to offer but JJ is a St. Paul native

by bronzeagle on Nov 21, 2009 4:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

The Twins can't compete with Feliz and Smoak

But I seriously doubt that offer is on the table, Feliz is insanely good, and the Rangers love Smoak

The Hochevar Principle: The future comes to all teams. Some teams wait for it. Those teams finish in last place a lot.

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 4:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I really do not think they are that Desperate

and the Rangers know how to run a farm system. I don’t think will bite at holland and feliez and Smoak. Unless we throw in someone else

by bronzeagle on Nov 21, 2009 11:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why would the Rangers have ANY interest in Uggla at all?

Last I checked they have a top 3 second baseman in Ian Kinsler, Davis/Smoak and Michael Young at 3B. There is no reason for them to want Uggla

The Hochevar Principle: The future comes to all teams. Some teams wait for it. Those teams finish in last place a lot.

by DaTwins on Nov 23, 2009 9:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know, you should ask the Rangers front office that question.

They and the Giants are the frontrunners for Uggla at the moment. Maybe they’ll use him in LF or at DH. I really have no clue why they are so interested in him. But hey, if they’re gonna give us top prospects for him then I’m not complaining.

by JP 23 on Nov 24, 2009 12:33 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

JJ for Feliz straight up even has some appeal to me

That 100 mph fastball is so sexy. Not to mention he actually has control over it. If he ends up being a starter he’s gonna be scary.

by tdp992 on Nov 22, 2009 3:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm thinking

they would be willing to part with smoak because Uggla would fill the roll of a DH type player which is what they would have Davis/Smoak do anyways (both can’t play 1st). Or they have plenty of minor league depth other then Smoak.
Unless the Marlins can get a similar package for JJ I think they should just raise their offer. (reports are that The FO and JJ’s people have only talked for 30 minutes)
I view JJ as one of about 10 true aces in the game and I think is value is such (more then $22M over 3 years) and if the marlins let this type of talent get away it is truely a big mistake.

by bronzeagle on Nov 21, 2009 5:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ken Davidoff believes that Yankees will try for Johnson

So now you have to weigh what the Twins have to offer, versus Jesus Montero.

The Hochevar Principle: The future comes to all teams. Some teams wait for it. Those teams finish in last place a lot.

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 5:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I believe everyone will offer

But I do recall some Yank FO guy saying “Yankees fans you’re looking at your future Ace” after JJ shut them down this year

by bronzeagle on Nov 21, 2009 5:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s what I was telling them after the game too.

Go Nevada Wolf Pack!

by BacksThePack on Nov 22, 2009 12:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would take Montero

Montero has a special bat, being in the NL he might have to play LF, but his bat is quite a bit better than Ramos. However, Ramos will play good defensive catcher.

The Hochevar Principle: The future comes to all teams. Some teams wait for it. Those teams finish in last place a lot.

by DaTwins on Nov 21, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This blows

Current Phinsider Feud Points: 23

T.Lex doesn't want to be fed, he wants to hunt. Can't just suppress sixty five million years of gut instinct.

by Patssuck456 on Nov 22, 2009 10:09 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

You guys probably aren't gonna like this, but I say we have another firesale.

Trade JJ, Uggla, Nolasco, Cantu, and Ross. We’re building towards 2012 anyways, and it’s become apparent that none of these guys are in our future plans. I say we get the prospects we need to build with now so that they’ll be ready by then. Best of all, we could still have a solid team without these guys with Coghlan, Maybin, Hanley, Volstad, West, Gaby Sanchez and Leo Nuńez still around.

Instead of Uggla, I think the Giants would be happier with Cantu and Ross since it fills there 2 biggest needs. Cantu and Ross for Conor Gillaspie, Nick Noonan, Clayton Tanner, Waldis Joaquin, and Brandon Crawford. For us it gives us the positional prospects that we’re lacking. Behind Michael Stanton, Logan Morrison, and Matt Dominguez, there is a huge lack of talent for positional prospects after that. We also get two pitchers who are highly talented. Tanner could be either a back end of the rotation starter or middle reliever. Waldis Joaquin could be a late inning reliever. A Jose Ceda, Ryan Tucker, and Waldis Joaquin trio at the back end of the bullpen would be excellent!

Trade Ricky Nolasco to the Twins for Wilson Ramos and Ben Tootle. We get the catcher of the future we need (now that Kyle Skipworth is a BUST!), and a mid-level pitching prospect with high upside.

Last but not least, JJ and Uggla for to the Rangers for Neftali Feliz, Justin Smoak and Derek Holland. We get 3 of the Rangers top 4 prospects. Yes. That may sound a bit much but they’re getting a top 10 ace and a middle of the line-up bat. Plus, they’re only giving up 3 prospects. I think it’s definitely fair!

And to make things better I’d sign Ardolis Chapman and Noel Argulles, the two Cuban defectors with the money we were gonna use on Josh Johnson! And sign a could veterans for cheap to replace the guys we traded. Maybe some guys that will be non-tendered like Conor Jackson, Bobby Jenks, Kelly Johnson, Scott Olsen, etc…

That will make me very happy! :) Ofcourse the chances of all this are slim to none. But this is the kind of crap that’s going on in my head. Lol. We’d still have a solid team this season and next, while having great teams after that!

by JP 23 on Nov 22, 2009 1:02 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Tootle cannot be traded

Drafted in 2009…

By the way, why would you want a firesale when your in a winnable division with a top 5 player in the league and a very solid rotation

The Hochevar Principle: The future comes to all teams. Some teams wait for it. Those teams finish in last place a lot.

by DaTwins on Nov 23, 2009 9:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rangers Deal actually doesnt look that bad for either team

the fish get 3 pitchers
1. Feliz – Set/up guy on Opening Day & could close before end of the year; or the fish can try to Joba him
2. Smoak – another big-time pitching prospect to compete for the job in 2010/11/12
3. Holland – LH starter who may need some work but could work into rotation this year as 4th/5th
Anyways we would be getting the always elusive ‘switch-hitting pitcher’ in Holland

The Rangers get a #1 to supplant Millwood & their lineup looks pretty good:

Kinsler 2B
Young 3B
Hamilton CF
Cruz RF/DH
Uggla DH/2B
German/1B
Andrus SS
Teagarden C
Borbon CF

Or Texas could switch Young back to SS & put Uggla at 3B… unless of course they moved him over for a reason. Seems like the real questions are: Will Uggla be willing to move from 2B? If Uggla becomes DH, does he believe other teams/suitors would ever see him as an infielder again?

by byoung on Nov 24, 2009 3:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

They could put him at 1B

Chris Davis put up awful numbers last year at that position, Uggla would be a great replacement.

by tdp992 on Nov 24, 2009 5:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah not sure what i was thinking there

Smoak is definitely a big-time bat with comparisons to chipper & teixeira. Though trading uggla & jj for only 2 pitchers & 1 bat does seem like a low offer for the marlins to accept. One would think the marlins ask for at least one more player & at that point not sure if the rangers would pull the trigger on this since 1B seems to be one of their bigger holes in the lineup & with uggla seemingly needing convincing to switch positions.

by byoung on Nov 25, 2009 1:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

For 1 thing, Holland, Feliz, and Smoak are Texas 3 best prospects.

Another thing to keep in mind is that all 3 are in the top 50 prospects discussion. And if the Rangers were to add a prospect or 2, ilthey would be lower level prospects. That’s why I didn’t add them into the deal. But hands down, that’s the best offer we could possibly get. Unless the Yankees offered Phil Hughes, Jesus Montero, and Austin Jackson (and a lower level prospect or 2) for just JJ. Then I’d say to take that deal in a heartbeat.

by JP 23 on Nov 25, 2009 7:20 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that is the best offer we could get

but maybe I’m underrating Uggla but I still think the rangers will be hesisitant to accept. We would probably need to add another player like bonifacio/vandy

by bronzeagle on Nov 25, 2009 11:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oh thats what I meant

texas throws in a lower level guy and we throw in a AAAA player
It would make the trade more even.
We’d be getting 2 ML ready SP and a 1b thats about a year away and a guy maybe 2-3 out.
They’d get a Star pitcher and a good 2b and like I said a AAAA player
argueably Feliez ( and maybe holland) have proven themselves

by bronzeagle on Nov 25, 2009 12:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We'd have one of, If not the best pitching rotations in all of baseball in a couple of years if we can trade for Feliz and Holland, and also sign Chapman!

Plus Volstad, and West! Not to mention we’d have one of the best line-ups in baseball as well! We’d be contending for the title every season for the next 6-10 years starting in 2012 if we we’re to make that deal. Lol. Just my opinion. Ofcourse, that’s if all pans out and guys like Chapman, Feliz, Stanton, and Morrison (and the rest of the prospects we mentioned) live up to the players they should be.

by JP 23 on Nov 26, 2009 5:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

2012

1- Chris Coghlan, 2B
2- Cameron Maybin, CF
3- Hanley Ramirez, SS
4- Michael Stanton, RF
5- Justin Smoak, 1B
6- Logan Morrison, LF
7- Matt Dominguez, 3B
8- Wilson Ramos, C

Aroldis Chapman, LHP
Neftali Feliz, RHP
Derek Holland, LHP
Chris Volstad, RHP
Sean West, LHP

Jose Ceda, Closer
Ryan Tucker, Set-up Guy

On paper, that’s a championship team.

by JP 23 on Nov 25, 2009 7:28 AM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

OR

1- Chris Coghlan, 2B
2- Cameron Maybin, CF
3- Hanley Ramirez, SS
4- Michael Stanton, RF
5- Jesus Montero, C
6- Logan Morrison, 1B
7- Matt Dominguez, 3B
8- Austin Jackson, LF

Aroldis Chapman, LHP
Phil Hughes, RHP
Chris Volstad, RHP
Sean West, LHP
Chad James, LHP

Jose Ceda, Closer
Ryan Tucker, Set-up Guy

Also a very good team.

by JP 23 on Nov 25, 2009 7:38 AM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

hes a cuban defector

and is free to sign with any team. The marlins (along with every other team) have been linked to him. Hes got a good heater and appears like a top of the rotation guy.

by bronzeagle on Nov 25, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They say he's just a notch below Steven Strausberg.

If JJ won’t take the deal, they should split the money they offered him and give it to Chapman and the other Cuban Defector, Noel Argulles. And I’m sure they would love to sign with the Marlins and live in Miami. Best of all, Chapman may be better than Josh Johnson which would mean that we could add a bunch of prospects for the future and still have an ace starter to take over for JJ’s absense.

by JP 23 on Nov 25, 2009 12:28 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

looking at those lineups....

They’re for the most part (as of today) accurate.. not concerning players not yet traded for. Though, no matter how many times this happens, trading the team away THIS time seems different. Would like to think everyone is expendable EXCEPT Hanley AND JJ (& now Coghlan.) I would think we should be able to sign JJ for 5 years (let alone 4) no questions asked. I don’t care that he’s had some injury problems and definitely had a decline for the last 1/3 or 1/4 of the season.

When Uggla/Nolasco go it’ll sting since we basically stole those guys from other teams… oh well. All will probably be forgotten if we can pull off a Lee/Sizemore/Phillips-esque trade(s.)

by byoung on Nov 25, 2009 6:15 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

honestly

I wouldn’t mind just paying all of our arb players for the next couple of years like JJ and Uggla, and see if we can compete. If Nolasco and JJ can both turn in great years and the rest of our guys are solid, I think we could definitely be a favorite to win the wild card.

by tdp992 on Nov 26, 2009 9:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree. We're so close, we're one bat, closer, starter away from being a title contender!

And it shouldn’t have to cost that much. We could sign low risk/high reward players for inexpensive.

We can sign a Ben Sheets, Brad Penny, Noah Lowrey, or Chien Meng Wang as our No.3 starter and none should cost all that much.

For a bat, we could re-sign Nick Johnson or add Mark DeRosa, Rick Ankiel, Ryan Garko, Vladimir Gurerro, Hank Blalock, Jermaine Dye, etc….

And for a closer, we could sign JJ Putz or Brett Myers. Or we can move Anibal Sanchez or Andrew Miller (or both) to the Bullpen.

Ofcourse, this isn’t ever gonna happen cause our owner is a cheap ass.

by JP 23 on Nov 26, 2009 6:48 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Jermaine Dye does not belong in the NL

His defense is almost on level with adam dunn. And the other guys you listed probably cost too much anyway. I think we should just give Morrison a shot and see what he can do.

by tdp992 on Nov 26, 2009 7:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Im not saying we're getting him. Read the post above mine.

I’m just saying saying that if we would add another starter, a closer, a solid bat to this team, we’d be a legit contender. But as I said, we’ll never do that cause our owner is a cheap ass.

by JP 23 on Nov 26, 2009 8:37 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Perrotto update

Perrotto reports that the Marlins are “very willing” to trade Josh on his twitter feed.

Also, Keith Law suggested two ready prospects and two AA prospects.

by toonsterwu on Nov 27, 2009 7:58 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

nolasco's good enough to be a number 1 guy

and when healthy the rest of our rotation is pretty solid. If we could get a full year out of anbibal and if andrew miller could finally come around we have a pretty good staff.

by tdp992 on Nov 28, 2009 9:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

From RotoWorld

Josh Johnson’s agent Matt Sosnick would be “surprised” to see the pitcher traded this winter, according to Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com.
“I’d be less surprised if Elijah showed up at my parents’ house this Passover than if they trade him before the start of the season,” Sosnick said. According to two sources with knowledge of the club’s intentions, the Marlins do not plan to trade Johnson this winter. Speculation ran rampant following a “tweet” by John Perrotto of Baseball Prospectus on Friday night, but it appears the Marlins will hang on to their young ace for now.

by GMFB on Nov 29, 2009 7:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/rangers-offered-smoak-feliz-for-johnson.html

Does anyone else think that story is not true? I just can’t imagine we were actually offered Smoak AND Feliz and we turned it down. I’m sorry but for Feliz and Smoak I would trade JJ in a second.

by tdp992 on Dec 8, 2009 11:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Florida Marlins.
Start posting about the Marlins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Small
Uggla to stick around for '10
Miamidolphinslogo_small
Who are our rivals?
Slugger_small
Jim Thome
Dwork-1_small
Marlins sign Josh Johnson to 4-year extension!!!!
Small
Why is Baseball Forcing the Florida Marlins to Spend? They’re Successful.
Small
Florida Marlins All-Decade Team
Rsc_miami2_small
What we should do during the offseason......
Mukuro_small
Break down of Marlin's top 7 hitting specs
Mukuro_small
A look at the '10 bullpen

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Drunkhomer_small craig

Gamefish_small GameFish